1. Introduction
What if everything you were taught about electricity was incomplete?
Current theory describes what happens — charges attract and repel, current flows through wires, lightning strikes. But it never explains why. We’re given labels for behaviours without any insight into mechanism. It’s like describing gravity as “things fall down” and calling that an explanation.
This document offers a fundamentally different view. One where electricity and gravity are not separate mysteries but two ways of looking at the same thing. One where “empty” space is not empty at all, but an ocean of energy — and matter is what happens when that energy binds itself into stable patterns.
The ideas here align with serious theoretical physics (Superfluid Vacuum Theory, Stochastic Electrodynamics, Zero-Point Field research) but are presented without the jargon. You don’t need a physics degree to understand this. You need only be willing to question what you were taught.
2. The Central Idea: Space is an Ocean of Energy
Imagine the universe as an infinite ocean.
Not water, but energy. A field that fills all of space, vibrating at frequencies beyond our perception. Waves move through it in every direction, passing through each other and continuing on — just as ocean waves do. This field has pressure. It has flow. It has the capacity to store and transmit energy.
Matter is not separate from this ocean. Matter is the ocean, locally bound.
Think of a whirlpool in water. The whirlpool is not made of different stuff than the water around it — it is water, organised into a stable, self-sustaining pattern. Matter works the same way. An electron, a proton, an atom — these are standing waves in the energy field. Stable resonances. Patterns that persist.
The technical term is “oscillon” — a localised oscillation that maintains itself through its own dynamics. But you can simply think of it as a knot in the fabric of space. Energy tied up in a pattern that doesn’t easily untie.
This single insight — that matter is bound energy, not something separate from space — resolves mysteries that have puzzled physics for a century.
3. What Electricity Actually Is
3.1 The Confused State of Current Teaching
Ask ten physicists “what is electricity?” and you’ll get ten different answers. The word is used to mean:
- Charge (the stuff on a charged balloon)
- Current (what flows through wires)
- Energy (what you pay for on your power bill)
- Phenomena (sparks, shocks, lightning)
Students are taught that electricity “flows in a loop” (conservation) but is also “consumed by your appliances” (conversion). Both cannot be true of the same thing. The confusion isn’t in the students — it’s in the teaching.
3.2 Clear Definitions
Within the energy-field framework, everything becomes clear:
| Term | What It Actually Is |
|---|---|
| Electric Field | A pressure gradient in the energy field. High pressure pushes toward low pressure — just like air or water. |
| Magnetic Field | Rotation (spin) in the energy field. When energy flows, it creates swirls — like water spiralling down a drain. |
| Voltage | Pressure difference between two points. A battery maintains a pressure differential; that’s all it does. |
| Current | The drift of matter (electrons) through the field. Electrons are oscillons — tiny standing waves — being pushed by the pressure gradient. |
| Electrical Energy | Pressure waves travelling through the field at the speed of light. Energy doesn’t travel in wires — it travels in the field around wires. |
| Resistance | How hard it is for oscillons to move through the material. Resistance converts directed flow into heat (random vibration). |
3.3 The Speed Paradox Resolved
Here’s something your teachers probably couldn’t explain:
Electrons in a wire drift at about 0.1 millimetres per second. Yet when you flip a light switch, the light comes on instantly. How can electricity travel at near light-speed if electrons move slower than a snail?
Answer: The signal isn’t the electrons. The signal is a pressure wave in the field.
Think of a long tube filled with ping-pong balls. Push one ball in at one end, and a ball pops out the other end almost instantly — even though no individual ball travelled the length of the tube. The pressure propagated instantly; the ballsbarely moved.
Electrical signals work the same way. The pressure wave (energy) travels at near light-speed through the field surrounding the wire. The electrons (oscillons) drift slowly, pushed by local pressure. Two completely different phenomena — which is why using one word (“electricity”) for both creates endless confusion.
3.4 Where Does the Energy Actually Go?
Energy doesn’t flow through your appliances. It flows into them.
The field carries energy from the power station to your home. At the light bulb, the pressure wave does work on the electrons (oscillons) passing through the filament. The directed pressure is converted into heat and light. The electrons continue around the loop — they’re not consumed. The pressure is what’s used up.
Your power bill measures how much pressure-wave energy you converted into heat, light, and motion. The electrons are just the medium through which that conversion happens.
4. Electrostatic Pressure and Matter
4.1 The Inverse Relationship
Here’s an observation that standard physics acknowledges but doesn’t explain:
The atmospheric voltage gradient shows approximately 100-120 V/m at sea level, increasing with altitude to a total potential difference of 250,000-400,000 volts between Earth’s surface and the ionosphere.
As you move away from concentrated matter (Earth), the electrostatic pressure increases. Why?
Because matter displaces field energy.
Where matter concentrates, it has “borrowed” energy from the ambient field to bind itself into stable patterns. The local field pressure drops. Where matter is absent, the field returns to its natural, higher-energy state.
This is directly observable. It’s not theory — it’s measurement.
4.2 The Vacuum Capacitor Experiment
Standard theory says a vacuum should be a perfect insulator. There are no particles to carry charge. Yet experiment shows the opposite:
In my tests, a vacuum chamber filled with electrostatic pressure from a charged plate exhibited remarkable behaviour:
- The charge distributed immediately and evenly throughout the chamber
- A self-organising magnetic field formed around the chamber
- The charge persisted for days after the source was disconnected
Rather than acting as an insulator, the vacuum acted as a perfect conductor. Empty space isn’t empty. It’s a field that stores and distributes energy.
(Note: Alternative explanations exist — dielectric absorption in chamber walls could contribute. Rigorous replication with controlled materials would distinguish between possibilities. The observation stands regardless of final mechanism.)
4.3 Why Both Polarities Appear on One Object
Using a coulomb meter on a “single polarity” charged object reveals something conventional theory cannot explain: both positive and negative readings at opposite ends of the same object.
If charge were merely electrons moving from one object to another, this would be impossible. An object with excess electrons should read negative everywhere.
But if charge is a flow pattern in the field — a current, not a substance — then it necessarily has directionality. The charge flows through the object, entering at one end and exiting at the other. This is field behaviour, not particle transfer.
4.4 The Triboelectric Effect
Quickly pull two plastic sheets apart and both become charged — and both repel each other.
Standard theory says one should be positive (lost electrons) and one negative (gained electrons). They should attract. Yet they repel.
This framework explains it simply: The rapid separation creates a momentary low-pressure zone (like pulling a suction cup off a window). The field rushes in to equalise. Both sheets are charged by the same pressure transient — not by exchanging particles with each other.
The air itself is violently expelled, the same way a charged ball is flung from a Van de Graaff generator.
5. Attraction and Repulsion: The Bjerknes Mechanism
5.1 How Like Charges Repel
In 1906, physicist Vilhelm Bjerknes discovered something remarkable: two spheres pulsating in a fluid exert forces on each other. The mechanism is pure hydrodynamics — no mysterious “charge” required.
When Sphere A pulsates, it creates pressure waves. These waves reach Sphere B, which is also pulsating. Depending on their phase relationship:
- In phase (pulsing together): They attract
- Out of phase (pulsing oppositely): They repel
The force follows an inverse-square law — exactly like Coulomb’s Law for electric charges. This isn’t coincidence. It’s the same phenomenon.
5.2 What “Positive” and “Negative” Actually Mean
In the energy-field framework, electric charge is not a substance. It’s a phase relationship.
All matter oscillates (that’s what standing waves do). “Positive” and “negative” describe whether two oscillons are pulsating in sync or out of sync with each other, relative to the background field.
- Same phase → repel (like charges repel)
- Opposite phase → attract (unlike charges attract)
This explains why positive and negative charges have exactly equal magnitude. They’re not different substances — they’re the same structure in opposite phase relationship to the field.
5.3 Why Charge is Quantised
Why can’t you have half an electron’s charge? Standard physics has no answer.
In the energy-field framework, it’s geometric necessity.
A standing wave that sustains itself must close on itself — the phase must match up after going around the loop. This is only possible for integer multiples of the wavelength. You can’t have 1.5 windings in a vortex. You can’t have half a knot.
Charge is quantised because topology is quantised. It’s geometry, not magic.
6. Gravity as Field Gradient
6.1 The Same Phenomenon, Different Measurement
High atmospheric pressure = low electrostatic pressure. High electrostatic pressure = low matter density.
This is not coincidence. It’s the same gradient measured two ways.
Gravity measures the slope inward — toward where energy is concentrated (matter). Voltage measures the slope outward — toward where the field returns to its natural state.
If matter is condensed energy — stable patterns that have withdrawn energy from the ambient field — then where matter exists, the field is depleted. The voltage gradient isn’t something being added as you go up; it’s the field returning to normal as you move away from the energy sink that matter represents.
6.2 Why Gravity is So Weak
Physics calls this the “hierarchy problem”: why is gravity 10³⁶ times weaker than electromagnetism?
The framework answers simply:
Electromagnetism operates at the scale of the oscillon itself — electron shells, atomic bonds. The coupling is direct and strong.
Gravity is the residual pressure gradient from matter displacing the ambient field. Since matter represents an infinitesimally small perturbation of the field’s total energy, the gradient is correspondingly tiny.
Imagine a cup of water removed from an ocean. The “gravity” of that cup is the slope of the ocean surface caused by its absence. It’s real, but it’s a perturbation, not a fundamental force.
6.3 Why Vacuum Chambers Don’t Float
If gravity is field displacement, why doesn’t a vacuum chamber float?
With air inside: The matter (gas molecules) has borrowed energy from the field. The pressure outside is higher than inside.
With vacuum inside: You’ve removed the matter, so the field rushes back in to fill the deficit. The “empty” space inside now has the same field energy as outside. There’s no differential.
The vacuum doesn’t float because there’s no energy imbalance to act on. To create buoyancy, you would need to maintain an actual energy deficit — prevent the field from equalising, not just remove matter.
7. Lightning: Equilibrium Restoration
7.1 The Standard Theory’s Problem
Conventional theory says lightning requires ice crystals colliding in clouds, separating charge through friction. But lightning occurs in “warm clouds” — tropical systems where cloud tops are warmer than 0°C. No ice exists. The standard mechanism cannot function.
7.2 The Pressure Explanation
Thunderstorms are low-pressure systems. This is directly observable — air rushes inward, clouds build rapidly.
When atmospheric pressure drops suddenly, the corresponding electrostatic pressure spikes (the inverse relationship). The field energy that was displaced by the now-absent matter surges back.
When rain begins, it creates a conductive path. Lightning is the discharge — the system restoring equilibrium.
Lightning doesn’t generate the global electrical circuit. It corrects disturbances in an already-stable system.
7.3 Supporting Evidence
Studies of tropical cyclones show strong correlation between rapid pressure deepening and bursts of lightning activity. The pressure-drop explanation requires no ice: rapid pressure drop → lower matter density → increased field pressure → discharge.
This is testable. Compare lightning timing to pressure transients (dP/dt) rather than ice content. If pressure changes predict lightning better than ice signatures — especially in warm clouds — the mechanism is confirmed.
8. The Speed of Light
8.1 Not a Geometric Constant
Standard physics treats the speed of light as a fundamental constant of geometry — the universe’s speed limit, built into spacetime itself.
The energy-field framework offers a different view: c is the speed of sound in the field.
Just as sound travels at a specific speed through air (determined by air’s density and compressibility), light travels at a specific speed through the energy field. The speed depends on the medium’s properties.
This is why light slows down in glass or water — the medium’s properties change. In “empty” space, c represents the acoustic limit of the vacuum field itself.
8.2 Variable Speed of Light
If c depends on field properties, then c might vary under extreme conditions.
Near massive objects (where the field is stressed by matter displacement), c might differ from its value in empty space. In the early universe (higher energy density), c might have been different.
This could solve the “horizon problem” in cosmology — why regions of the universe that have never been in causal contact have the same temperature. If c was higher in early epochs, information could have propagated further, establishing equilibrium across regions now separated by cosmic distances.
9. Why “Empty Space” Isn’t
9.1 The Zero-Point Field
Even at absolute zero temperature, with all matter removed, space contains measurable energy. This “zero-point energy” is not theoretical — it’s confirmed by the Casimir effect (an attractive force between conducting plates) verified experimentally in 1997.
“Empty” vacuum buzzes with electromagnetic fluctuations. Space is not nothing. It’s a field with intrinsic energy — the ocean in which all matter forms and through which all forces propagate.
9.2 The Vacuum Catastrophe
Quantum Field Theory predicts the vacuum energy density should be approximately 10¹¹³ joules per cubic metre. Astronomical observations show it’s approximately 10⁻⁹ joules per cubic metre. This 120-order-of-magnitude discrepancy is called the “vacuum catastrophe” — the worst prediction in the history of physics.
The energy-field framework resolves this through equilibrium thermodynamics. The immense microscopic energy exists, but it’s in equilibrium — like pressure in a deep ocean that doesn’t crush a submarine because it’s equalised inside and out. The field has enormous energy but zero net pressure because the system is balanced.
Gravity isn’t generated by absolute energy. It’s generated by perturbations from equilibrium — by matter disturbing the balance.
10. What This Means
10.1 A Unified Picture
For a century, physics has treated electricity, magnetism, and gravity as separate phenomena requiring separate explanations. The energy-field framework reveals them as aspects of a single reality:
- Space is an ocean of energy
- Matter is that energy bound into stable standing waves (oscillons)
- Electric fields are pressure gradients in the ocean
- Magnetic fields are rotation (vorticity) in the ocean
- Gravity is the slope toward where energy has been concentrated into matter
- Light is sound — pressure waves propagating through the ocean
- Charge is phase relationship — oscillons pulsing in or out of sync
We’ve been measuring the same thing from different angles and calling it by different names.
10.2 Testable Predictions
This isn’t just philosophy. The framework makes predictions distinct from standard theory:
| Prediction | Test Method | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Lightning correlates with pressure changes more than ice content | Compare dP/dt sensors to ice radar | Months |
| Static charge depends on separation rate, not just humidity | Controlled separation experiments | Weeks |
| Voltage potential in vacuum chambers equalises with standard materials | Measure internal vs external voltage | Months |
| “Warm lightning” (no ice) follows pressure transients | Analyse tropical storm data | Exists now |
10.3 Technologies Beyond Current Reach
If gravity and electrostatic pressure are inverse expressions of the same field gradient, then manipulating one should affect the other.
Current technology can manipulate electromagnetic fields easily. If those fields are fundamentally connected to gravitational gradients, then gravity modification may not require exotic physics — just a deeper understanding of what we’re already working with.
Not by fighting gravity. By understanding what gravity actually is.
11. Conclusion
The conventional model of electricity — positive and negative particles hopping between objects — explains observations adequately but provides no mechanism. It’s description, not understanding.
This framework proposes that what we call “electricity” and what we call “gravity” are inverse expressions of the same underlying reality: an ocean of energy that fills all space, from which matter condenses as stable patterns, and through which all forces propagate as waves and gradients.
The evidence surrounds us:
- The atmospheric voltage gradient (field returning to its natural state away from matter)
- The behaviour of charge in vacuum (field, not particles)
- Lightning in warm clouds (pressure-driven, not ice-driven)
- The quantisation of charge (topological necessity)
- The exact equality of positive and negative charge magnitudes (same structure, opposite phase)
The ocean is real. The waves are real. Matter is the ocean, locally bound. And we’ve been standing on the shore, measuring ripples, without realising we were looking at the same water the whole time.
Appendix: Key Terms
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Oscillon | A stable standing wave — energy bound into a self-sustaining pattern. What we call “particles.” |
| Field pressure | The energy state of the ambient field. What we measure as voltage. |
| Vorticity | Rotation in the field. What we measure as magnetic field. |
| Phase | The timing of an oscillon’s pulsation relative to others. Determines attraction or repulsion. |
| Equilibrium | The balanced state of the field. Disturbances (matter) create gradients that appear as forces. |
| Zero-Point Field | The electromagnetic background of the vacuum — not empty, but filled with fluctuating energy. |
Further Reading
For the rigorous mathematical framework underlying these ideas:
- Volovik, G.E. — The Universe in a Helium Droplet (Oxford University Press, 2003)
- Haisch, B., Rueda, A., Puthoff, H.E. — “Inertia as a Zero-Point Field Lorentz Force” (Physical Review A, 1994)
- Harrison, R. — Harrison’s Theorem of Anti-gravity (Zenodo, 2026)
- Harrison, R. — Hydrodynamic Quantum Gravity: Theoretical Foundations (Zenodo, 2026)
- Harrison, R. — Hydrodynamic Electromagnetism: Maxwell’s Equations in the Superfluid Vacuum (Zenodo, 2026)
The ocean has always been here. We just forgot to look at the water.
We have forgotten Gauss’s Law on the “electrostatic equilbrium on surfaces.” The solid magentic ball spinning underneath our Earth is bringing it’s loose particles up to the surface creating an electrostatic force. We know from all experiments that any materials made of atoms falls into the Earth, nothing escapes this gravitational force. click on science… Web: rolandechobirds.com (email is) roland@rolandechobirds.com: Purdue Unv. Book Print: U.S. Patent 5,772,445 (inventor)
I think “gravity” is a manifestation of entropy/heat loss which is a manifestation of dark energy – if one were to put a heated plate in outer space and measure it’s heat loss I think you will find that if you can measure a small amount of gravity from that experiment you will see wha I mean, peter lu told me he agreed with that a few years ago
Dear Bill,
you want to check out Crookes experiments on Attraction and Repulsion of bodies with different temperature in a Vacuum. I think you are spot on!!!!!!
http://www.scribd.com/doc/122440945/On-Attraction-and-Repulsion-Resulting-from-Radiation
My opinion is that there is something missing.Lost in the past experiments done with elect.,mag.,electrons,protons,ECT. Need to go back and slowly double check experiments done in the 100 yrs.min.
Bill… Look at my paper (rolandechobirds.com) click on Science… It is becoming obvious that nothing escapes the electrostatic force, experiments are proving these facts. It is the loose particles that jump up to the surface (motion of mass) from the solid magnetic ball inside the earth that creates the electrostatic force. Nothing escapes the electrostatic force, experiments prove this fact, in fact we can walk upside down in space if the electrostatic plate is strong enough (anti-gravity). It the Guassian Law! We live on a balloon called the Moho cover (plastic zone), the dark matter is the flux lines of the magnetic field we live in. Sincerely, Roland
Miles Mathis explains it best; charge as a photon spinning due to bombardment/collision with other photons produces magnetism. The problem is that we are in an unblanced system with much more matter than antimatter, hence great gravity and less electrical action. A balanced system is more electrical and less magnetic.
It is rather late in the day to be conflicted about electricity.
Miles Mathis says it best. Charge is created by photons being bombarded/collided with other photons. Our system is unbalanced with a greater proportion of matter and less anti matter, hence we have max gravity and low electricity. A balanced system has less gravity and more electricity. Both require ions. His site: milesmathis.com
It is rather late in the day to be conflicted about electricity.
I sent you info.. (rolandechobirds.com)
“Reminder” Motion of mass creates the electrostatic field. Photons is made of electric particles which is in motion! We know, nothing escapes the electrostatic force even neutrons which is made of electric particles (info.rolandechobirds.com). Perhaps we have to come to the realization that gravity (gravitons) may be the invisible flux lines (dark energy) of the electrostatic/magnetic force. We know, the only force ever discovered is the electromagnetic force, all else is still in theory. And a thought? “If our system were really unbalanced, would we be alive? To me, it is becoming obvious that the electrostatic, magnetic, and electric forces are one and the same (Inverse Sq. Laws) and that gravity does not exist! Einstein sincerely believed that there were flaws in his 1916 paper. Before he died, he wrote a letter on this infomation. Sincerely, Roland
Thanks Roland. Gravity itself does not exist as a disparate force. Gravity is simply the recognition that all objects are moving towards the mass of the earth at the same speed. I agree all forces are one.
Thanks Rob: I sincerely believe, we must re-examine the inverse sq. laws and it’s relationship to the Gaussian laws on the “electrostatic force which is has an equilibrium on ALL surfaces” now that we have discovered recently on July 18, 1996 (front page NYTimes), that the center of the earth is a “solid magnet!” This follows Gauass’s laws which he received when studying with Michael Faraday! WOW! In fact, this means… we can now create “artificial gravity!” If you charge up a plate in space creating an electrostatic field, all materials including human beings will “attract” to the plate. WOW! This is obvious, from everyday laboratory experiments. Sincerely, Roland (see, rolandechobirds.com, click on science)
Roland, I’ll follow up your comments and references with great interest. I note that from my own experiments that a charged plate attracts all objects regardless of their electrical properties. Objects that are unable to dissipate the charge in turn become charged and are repelled. It’s fascinating to watch a polystyrene ball vibrate on a charged plate, turning itself around until the whole ball is painted with electricity before it is then repelled. If you have any links please send them through. I have a special interest in electrostatics. I have been told that it is far too late to be questioning this science but I completely disagree. Electricity is the fabric of our universe but this in itself is only motion and pressure. Both matter and motion continuously move through what we call “empty” space. And we know from the laws of thermodynamics and wave studies that no motion exists independently. The earth is bombarded or part of a massive electrical pressure wave from the sun. We call this gamma rays or X-rays etc but these are vibratory expressions of the one larger force. It’s a big conversation but a fascinating one. Cheers. r.
Rob: Yes! We must come to the realization, that we dismissed the “electrostatic force” when Michael Faraday discovered “electricity!” (motion of mass) Please, read about the study of insects that I experimented on a hempishpere (rolandechobirds.com). Amazing! I also now have invented the “electric radiometer” and clearly understand the electromagentic waves moving thru “empy space.” This info will come out soon, I’m now working with universities and corporate sponsors. Good to see you are studing the “electrostatic force” (motion of mass) this electrical force is what is creating LIFE! Please keep in communcations with me. Call me anytime. My number is 845-765-1480 Sincerely, Roland
I’m glad I bumped into this blog. I’ve been thinking along similar lines for a while. There’s an interesting space experiment that throws only makes sense within this new explanation of electrostatics. http://www.geekosystem.com/water-droplets-in-space/
Interesting experiment, but appears to use electrostatic forces.
Rob… Sooner or later we will have to review Gaussian Laws on the “Electrostatic Equilibrium on Surfaces” which he learned from Michael Faraday! Motion of mass from that round solid ball inside Earth may be creating more of a major role than we think on the gravitation field upon the Life of the Earth. “Frictional Force” as Newton described it! Meantime, See RoctekHub: “Solar Electric Sun Bulb!” electric radiometer! and (solarexpojam.com) Roland
Bill… Sincere thanks for Crooks experiments on Earth… like to see some of them conducted in space where there’s no electrostatic force? Also, I recently experimented and filmed that if you create a ball of an electrostatic force from dry clothes right after you take your clothes out of the dryer, a long string will appear to only point to the of it’s own center of gravity and not the Earths! Like the spider on a hemisphere, when it slowly goes down about 3″ to our center of our gravity earth, and you charge inside the hemisphere, the spider’s web no longer point it’s web to our earth’s gravity, it points to the charged hemisphere gravitational field when you motion the hemisphere at different angles! WOW! Explain that! Roland (rolandechobirds.com)
Hi all, I try to replicate Mr. George S. Piggott experiments, he was able to lift objects spheres few grams. image link http://www.rexresearch.com/piggott/fig1.jpg
Cannot get on research text… new set of experiments on electrostatic related to gravity. See rolandechobirds.com – proceedings/Prudue Unv.
a great attempt to explain these forces and there actions but with it such failure. in forty years of studying electric and magnetic forces I can only partly agree with some of the conclusions you have come to. the major point being that I can have magnet currents and electric charges moving on wires totally independent of each other.
Electrostatic research represents a vast energy source that would cost the end user almost nothing to exploit. Got to keep the unwashed masses in line by controlling their access to energy, so this subject is not usually discussed or taught in schools.
If you spark static electricity into an automotive coil, the coil will lower the voltage and raise the amps. After that, it can be pulsed into a battery and stored. A home battery charger might be an insulated wire 400 feet or longer, strung at least 10 feet high. Put an automotive spark plug on the end and set it to discharge into an automotive coil. Once it’s out of the coil it will have enough amps and voltage to go into a battery. Static naturally charges that wire, so it’s almost free of cost to the end user.
Another option is to use the spark to affect a magnet’s field. If you set a magnet and a coil (both stationary) in proximity to one another, then discharge static electricity within the magnet’s field, that field will move. The coil will react to that movement and transduce electricity. (Magnet’s field moves because a plasma burst creates a short but intense magnetic field of it’s own, and we know what happens if a magnetic field suddenly appears within a permanent magnet’s field.)
These two techniques could partially address the world’s energy needs. It will never be explored, accepted, or taught.
We must remember, all mass (which is electromagnetic) is in “motion” throughout the universe, and is creating a constant electromagnetic flux lines surrounding its mass whether they dependent or independent of each other. To me what is most important, is the Gaussian Laws. See rolandechobirds.com (click on Science)
Have you or any of your friends in science heard that it has been known generally that electrostatic is not completely understood? As a student in about 1960, in physics lectures, I understood that there were questions then and the thinking that something was incomplete and/or incorrectbaboutvelectrostatics. Further, the search for a unified field theory showed the need for further work was needed.
Is it possible that the answer to further knowledge on the theory of Electrostatic is potentially a part of the need for a Unified Field Theory or a part of that need could be filled by more and greater understanding of why You see a need for explanation in a different way, just what gravity is, also what is anti-gravity.
Have you considered that the relation between earth’so gravity & that of the moon is one of gravity & antigravity.
Consider the force of gravity of the moon on the tides of earth’s bodies of water. That could show that the earth’so gravity – the moon’so gravity leaves a sum, arithmetical sum, of gravity less that of the moon, showing that the water (tides) have gone up if it is high tide, and anti-gravity caused it to rise.
Likewise, you refer to light, if it is particles, expends itself way before it could possibly reach earth if it truly is matter or particles.
Consider one thing you mentioned, the action of a Van DeGraft genrrator, the charge enters the globe from within, the metal sphere.
Now, if you remember, the demonstration that shows a difference in potential depends on a charge physically inserted within the sphere by a belt, carrying it to the inside of the sphere, but once inside the sphere, that charge is exactly equal to the center of any sphere but opposite in charge, supposedly at an infinite distance.
Has any researcher ever done work on that part of Electrostatic to find out if it’s a valid way to look at electrostatics, a perfect way to transmit energy or light, an infinite distance with no losses.
Have you considered that the skull of a man could be a receiver or the surface of earth could be within its gas envelope, could also be a similar device and could exhibit that same infinite distance spherical receptor as a Vandergrift Sphere. With a field, Zero, inside but able to sense that electric difference of potential at any distance, even from billions of miles & light years away.
What do you think. I enjoy reading pages like this.tresscatt26@att
Please see Proceedings ESA on Electrostatics 2007. Purdue Unv. or rolandechobirds.com (click on science) Yes! we are now suspecting the electrocstatic force may be involved in the motion of mass on the Earth’s rotational force. Roland
You may also be interested in
Megaliths – static electricity – antigravity
Nikola Tesla once wrote: “The day when science begins to explore beyond physical phenomena, more will be discovered in a decade than over the centuries of its existence.”
Photographs of incredible discovery can be found online by the use of search engines. On the mountain Shoria in southern Siberia, scientists have discovered a massive wall of granite stones. Some of the huge granite stones weighed more than 3,000 tons and were built into the wall at a height of 40 meters. Zahi Hawass presents a similar case: “Some of the tombs are recessed and covered with rectangular blocks of stone the size of several freight wagons or small houses.” He does not comment on it so it sounds as if it was an everyday occurrence. Under the current interpretation of science, the transport of three-thousand-ton rock blocks was performed by towing ropes. These were then hailed up to 40 meters high by an unknown way. Unfortunately, this is an opinion of many other scientists and it can not stand up to rational considerations. Since the weight of one solid cuboid is 3,000 tons, which equals fifty to sixty-ton tanks, it precludes further discussion.
This crucial information requires attracting the interest of research students. It needs to be highlighted that current science is unable to explain the lack of information about the transport of oversized rocks. The Granite wall on Mount Shoria will constantly remind researchers that people in ancient times had to solve the movement of rocks under the same natural conditions as those at present. The previously unseen features of one of the natural forces – the electric field, were creating a large obstacle to progress in many fields.
I consider antigravity as an unknown property of static electricity, without which the transport of oversized rocks would be unthinkable. Isolated cases of people or matter floating weightlessly have been described in history, but are not widely discussed due to the lack of convincing justification.
There are descriptions of people flying without the help of any technical device. A successful levitation has even been watched by the Emperor Francis I and his courtiers. The unusual hero was a mystic Schindler, who claimed that he can raise himself weightlessly at any time for at least fifteen minutes. The Emperor decided to investigate his claims. The testimony of the success of the test is preserved thanks to the free lord du Prel. The Emperor decided to remove the chandelier in the high hall of the Imperial Castle and replaced it with a hundred ducats. Schindler could keep it if he could get it without the help of any equipment. Schindler has struggled for about a minute as if he was warming up, but eventually managed to grab the money. Then he turned into a horizontal position by the ceiling and laid in space for a few minutes as if he rested after exercise. Finally, he slowly retreated back on the floor.
The Oregon Vortex is a circle that has a diameter of about fifty yards and exhibits anomalies the current knowledge of science can not explain. Tourists are amazed when they put a glass on a slippery slope and it rolls upwards. Another attraction is a fifteen-kilogram ball hanging on a chain. Visitors can see it hanging “from an angle,” thereby denying the laws of gravity. The sphere is swaying so that it only approaches the centre of the circle. Anyone can push the ball to the centre quite easily, but it is much harder to swivel it to the edge of the circle.
A similar anomaly is located in Italy near the Pope’s summer residence at the village of Rocca di Papa. The law of gravity does not work for about a hundred meters of a local road. People stop and watch their cars and leave bottles and cans roll up the hill. Local youth are riding on a bike uphill without having to step on the pedals. It is easy to see how a car with the engine off slowly travels up the hill. Nuclear physicist Luciano Gelmi poured water on the tarmac and watched in amazement as the water flowed uphill. Such places are also located in Japan, Poland, Germany and Scotland.
Antigravity is not easy to believe, but the three-thousand-ton solid rock that was elevated to a height of forty feet leaves little doubt. I think it will be more useful to familiarize students with the unknown characteristics of Oregon circle than having them drag the statues of Easter Island. It would be equally useful not to try to make up justifications of unconfirmed experiments at any cost.
If you would like to work towards antigravity, it is necessary to realize the fact that the megalithic culture went through the history as a unified group from menhirs to the cathedral, with static charge being the base of matter. Anti-gravity didn’t just fall from the sky, it was the result of the development of ancient civilization and we have to first get to know it. I believe that to gain knowledge about antigravity we first need to explain a wide range of prehistoric mysteries, like who was able to overcome the language barrier and construct very similar megalithic structures throughout the world.
Large concentrations of menhirs and dolmens in places such as the Golan Heights in Asia or the Caucasus Mountains indicate that, with regard to the population of the areas, dolmens were built disproportionately. The answer may not only lie in the energy reason, but also in the knowledge of other properties of static electricity. Russian dolmens are characterized by a progressive feature – the leading rock has a regular circular inlet opening in itself, thereby further increasing the wall energy concentration. This indicates a growing interest in research in this area. In this sense, we return to each megalithic structure that needs to be thoroughly evaluated. Let me give a few examples:
Throughout the territory of the Italian island of Sardinia, historians have counted over seven thousand Nuraghes, which are wondrous ancient “beacons.” These buildings are in fact built from large; often several-ton weighing stones laid on each other without mortar, and are hollow in its centre. The essence of all megalithic structures is the racking up material over the energy space to form a common charge. The areas around the Nuraghes contained enough stones, so they were used as a building material. The vertically tapered construction ensures stability, especially when not using mortar – the interior space could be used as dolmens, to supplement the body’s energy. Nuraghes worked as menhirs and other megalithic structures, but their excessive concentration has not been explained. Similar conical structures – called Brooches – were built in Scotland.
On the American continent people built earthed mounds that have the same function as Nuraghes or dolmens. These were less labour intensive and, in some cases, there was a lack of rocks. In the Czech Republic I noticed an unobtrusive but highly effective battery of static electricity by the river Vltava. It us a two meters high and several meters long stone wall, positioned perpendicular to the direction of water flow. Due to the changes in river flows, the zones of the water flow are in constant contact with the stone wall, which supplies energy. Similar stone walls, reminiscent of landfill stones are found in other places. The construction of energy structures never ceased. It was located mainly in church buildings, through antiquity and the Middle Ages, and remains to our time. It is unbelievable that a huge natural energy remained hidden to the attention of science and influenced us without our knowledge.
The Golan Heights is an area of about 1250 square kilometres, which is an important water source supplying water to four states. Excessive presence of static electricity can be deduced from a number of megalithic structures. The local circular structure with a diameter of 159 m consists of five concentric circles that are laid out in bulk stones with a total weight of about 37,000 tons. The largest stones used weigh around 20 tons. There are 8,500 other dolmens and menhirs located In the vicinity of this building, the largest of which weighs 50 tonnes and they are up to 7 meters high.
Sardinia has over seven thousand Nuraghes, the Caucasian mountains about 3,000 dolmens, and there are about 100,000 mounds as well as menhirs and dolmens on the American continent. From this we can deduce that there were millions of megalithic structures built across the globe. These are interesting data, but in order to come to any conclusion it is necessary to obtain more detailed information. It is unthinkable to deal with millions of megaliths, it could be enough to thoroughly examine a few selected sites, especially those where there were transports of millions of multi-ton rocks such as in the Caucasus, Lebanon, and the Golan Heights.
By the term investigate I mean: photographic documentation, coordinates, altitude, type of local surrounding rock, the type of rock that the megaliths consist of, etc.. If the emegalith is functional, then obtain the size of the aura and the spaces between the three zones to try to identify the source energy of the megalith, and possibly other information required by the specialists. Particular attention should be paid to “balanced rocks”, which may have been a replacement source of a communication structure.
It is a very time consuming task, but I think the magic word antigravity could work in the same way as the word gold rush. The prospect of high profits from fuel savings due to reduced weight of thousands of aircraft, ships and millions of cars may cause an increased research interest in some business groups. This will be further encouraged that it is nothing new, it is only necessary to reveal something that has already been found in the distant past.
Answers to your questions can be found on http://www.miroslavprovod.com
June 2014
Miroslav Provod
I seldom drop comments, however i did some searching and wound up here Electrostatic Theory is wrong!
| Our Electric Universe… & Anti-Gravity. And I do have
2 questions for you if you tend not to mind.
Is it simply me or does it give the impression like some of the comments appear like they are left by brain dead folks?
😛 And, if you are posting on additional online sites, I would
like to follow anything new you have to post.
Could you list of all of your public sites like your Facebook page, twitter
feed, or linkedin profile?
As we all know… wherever there is motion of mass… there is the electrostatic force (Guass: rolandechobirds.com). We know this “frictional force” is somehow related to the gravitational force, as Newton ponder on in his studies, but as to where the relationship lies… is still unknown. To me the electrostatic theory is never wrong… it is within us all the way to the stars of the unknown universe. As to the brain dead folks… wish them the best in learning more in their studies. I know I always keep learning more throughout my studies. It is a wonderful universe full of knowledge we live in. Victor Roland Mousaa
Sincere thanks for your interest… I went to Hollywood LA, we are working on a project that clearly shows our “Everyday repeatable laboratory experiments.” Then connecting these experiments to the gravitational force. We are now beginning to “realize” that the electrostatic force is connected to the gravitational force upon our Earth. (see:website: http://rolandechobirds.com) click in science button.
I am not a scientist or researcher, but it has crossed my mind that light waves travel on the real matter (empty space) and finds it way around what we think of as matter (empty space we see as atoms, etc). Light travels faster in a vacuum, sound travels faster through a solid. This is because of the true nature of each energies true medium. I think we see matter and empty space completely backwards. Just a thought.
http://tetryonics.com/
Hi Rob, this may sound stupid, but just wondering if the weight of the vacuum gets any heavier when you have it polarized?
Very interesting article by the way.
Can’t see how.
By “our nearest star”, I’m guessing you mean our second nearest star…?
Static(gravity) coming from silicate perovskite.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicate_perovskite
Basically pressure applied to it creates a piezo charge, which became a gravitational force. Gravity depends on pressure that applied on Si element and the concentration of Si or silicates. Everything contains silicon or silicates.
http://education.jlab.org/glossary/abund_uni.html
After silicon gone there are nothing left
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon-burning_process
Thank you
Clearly, we know we live on the Moho Cover of the Earth, which is made of crystal/silicon. We know it is three to thirty miles thick, and that this plastic balloon we live on is rotating at high speed of a thousand miles per hour. We know, from experimental facts no mass escapes the electrostatic force, not even live human beings! Why? Because everything is electromagnetic in nature. We are beginning to realize gravitons particle/wave theories do not exist! Proceedings of the ESA Annual Meeting on Electrostatics 2007, Victor Roland Mousaa, Inventor, US Patents (electrical) Dec. 2015
A new physical theory with STW ( Static Time Waves)
In the beginning was infinite geometric space. This space became filled with Static Time at absolute rest and absolute cold. Static time is strictly quantitative, and does not differentiate between past, present and future. Being quantifiable and measurable, static time is a scientific concept. Static time of 0.0033 microseconds per meter will be measured regardless of the direction chosen.
Stars move through static time, which does not disrupt their motion. Static time exists but is imperceptible. Static time is the deepest secret of the universe.
Static time fills all infinite space, eliminating the possibility of a vacuum. Static Time Waves (STW) travel through static time. The speed of STW is 300,000 km/second.
Aetzbar in amazon
The Newtonian universe is based on matter and force.
The Einsteinian universe is based on matter and energy.
The Aetzbarian universe is based on static time and energy.
There is no gravity, and there is no gravity waves.
There is Static Time , and there is Static Time Waves. (STW)
There is a particles of Static Time.
Static Time is real and measured.
Everyone knows the Dynamic Time.
It is time to recognize the Static Time.
http://www.amazon.com/Brief-History-Mans-Natural-Knowledge-ebook/dp/B019IAA1GU/ref=pd_rhf_gw_p_img_1?ie=UTF8&refRID=0YY8975M1RASTVYP04AQ
There is a place in Lewisberry, Penn.. where the ball/cars roll up hill in neutroul! We should study it! I believe it is the electrostatic force at work! Victor Roland Mousaa
I think a key principle to consider for your analyses is the “mean free path” one offered by Clausius in defense of the kinetic theory of gases. It relates to flow, dissipation and so forth.
In experiments we clearly know… the electrostatic force “attracts” most elements except “hydrogen” and oxygen” atoms… (gases). We need to study Gauss and his laws on the electrostatic force… I sincerely believe.. the rotation of the Earth is creating the electrostatic force on it surface which is then creating the attraction of elements, such as gases on it’s planet.
Is it that hydrogen and oxygen atoms generally more attached to their present environment or are too free to be attracted? Can they be attracted by abnormal conditions?
I believe, there is little mass and it is too weak to attract to the electrostatic force… more info. would be needed to confirm this theory. But, I sincerely believe Newton was close to understanding gravity, when he mentioned about the “frictional force.” Question: Why must always overcome this “frictional force” on earth to create electricity? (The Electricity Universe) Maybe, it has something to do with gravity???
Friction can cause mass to radiate, which can leave a vacuum in its wake, as an attractive force. Consider gravitational force of a gram per centimeter per light speed; it approximates to the value of the Hubble Constant. If we change the mass unit of the gravitational constant to be slightly greater, then the numerical value of the gravitational constant is also slightly increased, as for the Hubble Constant for a distance equal to the diameter of the hydrogen nucleus per light speed to equal the ratio of the gravitational force to the electrostatic force. Changing the mass unit of the gravitational constant neither changes the ratio of masses or the ratio of gravitational force to electrostatic force. There is also an arbitrary unit by which the gravitational and electrostatic forces equate. There is also a probability condition of Quantum Mechanics for the detection of energy. If emitted radiation is only slightly detected according to the Hubble Constant, then the vacuum effect in the wake of its emission and the vacuum fill could be the gravitational effect.
True we know, the vacuum is empty space with particles flying thru them within the universe. We know, mass in motion itself creates an electrostatic force which than creates an attractional field. It seems to me, from experiments from many scientists, any mass slightly smaller than another mass will attract to the larger mass… this also, includes light particles… on a quantum level… I believe, sooner than later… when looking out in Hubble’s Telescope.. we may find, it may be the “frictional force” from our mass in motion creating the gravitational field of our Earth…
See ken wheeler , uncovering the secrets of magnetism . It’s very interesting and his experiments are rather crude but wonderful. An eye opener. He has written a paper he gives freely. It’s worth checking out.
Why do 2 parallel wires attract if they have electric currents flowing in the same direction and repel if they have currents flowing in opposite directions?
thanks
Bob.. 1. We know. the rotation of magnetic balls (electrons) creates flux lines from the motion of it’s mass. 2. We know, we can rotate these magnetic balls east to west.. or west to east. 3. If we rotate one east to west… and another one west to east… we know the negative and positive “attract” each other.. and 4. If we rotate one east to west and another east to west (same), we know, opposites do not attract each other.. 5. Ampere’s discovery clearly demonstrates this conclusion.
I suspect the Feynman diagram is a convenience for a lack of explanation. A flow of electrons in 2 wires does not seem to make sense by it. Rather, electrons flowing in the same direction lose in perpendicular directions to the wires their interacting momenta for the wires to attract in order to establish a news state of equilibrium. If the currents flow in opposite directions, the interaction between them increases whereby the wires tend to repel. Does this make sense?
All we can say… is that we know… Opposites “attract” and like “repel” from each other… It’s negative and positive working with and against each other… thanks to Ampere for discovery this important experiment.
The correct answer, which I now know, is the right hand rule and magnetic polarization, but underlying this answer is virtual particle interaction according to Feynman.
Wow I think youre right. Check what I found here. Totally lines up: http://www.ignaciodarnaude.com/textos_diversos/Anti-gravity%20Propulsion.htm
Hi Rob
See if this helps.
Seyah/A Field Theory
How a magnet works…atoms, charge, orbitals…
The electro static force is the force of the material world. Wherever you have structure you have a point of zero gravity. Zero gravity creates mass defect and mass defect creates an electro static force which is of the fourth dimension that is in contact with the inner mass defect that is comprised of a positive and negative charge that occupies a portion of the same space in the same time. Two unequal electro static forces when in a vacuum produce light. Two unequal electro static forces when in the atmosphere produce an electro static medium similar to a vapour.
Hi Bill,
What is it (in a short description) that you observed that is not predicted by electrostatics theory? I have observed the following:
The propagation of the near Coulomb field is much higher than ‘c’. One can see this by means of a fast high bandwith oscilloscope, two field probes, a high voltage source (two objects with opposite charge) that will be discharged abruptly. Two field probes held at two different distances from the field source will register a change in electric field during the discharge, made visible as scope signal. One can calculate the disappearance of the electric field is faster than ‘c’, if the probes are not too far away from the source, and on the line of the direction of discharge (not in between the highly charged objects, but close to one of them). Thus, the Maxwell-Lorentz theory predicts an incorrect propagation velocity for the near Coulomb field. John Field (CERN) states that only QED predicts the more or less ‘instantaneous’ Coulomb field interaction correctly, I beg to differ. My GCED theory also explains this superluminal effect correctly, google “General Classical ElectroDynamics” (GCED). So indeed, something is wrong with standard classical electrodynamics theory.
Thank you for this — your experimental work on near-field propagation is fascinating and I wasn’t aware of GCED. I’ll look into it.
My observations are more atmospheric than laboratory-scale:
The global electrical circuit’s remarkable stability (~300kV, varying only ~15%) despite chaotic thunderstorm distribution suggests storms may be perturbations of an equilibrium state rather than generators of it.
“Warm lightning” in tropical systems where cloud-top temperatures never reach freezing — electrification without the ice-crystal mechanism that standard theory requires.
Both point toward the electric field having properties beyond what classical electrostatics describes — which aligns with your observation that Maxwell-Lorentz theory predicts incorrect propagation velocities for the near Coulomb field.
I’d be interested to hear whether GCED offers any predictions about atmospheric-scale phenomena.
I didn read anything what’s written here.. luck of time..But if u creat a engine who creats around self vacum,and produce static energy,its gonna fly,we can say anti gravity device…
Anti-gravity can actually come from creating any system which will use the confusion of matter against the orderly flow of energy. In designing a system to use positive and negative (night and day, the Ancients called it) polarities against each other, a Toroid coil with a caduceus winding can be used to separate these fields-and play them against each other.